How S Corp Owners Should Set Salary vs. Distributions

S corporation owners who draw income from their businesses face a specific IRS requirement: they must pay themselves a reasonable salary before taking any shareholder distributions, according to accounting expert David Riggs, writing in HelloNation. The distinction matters because salary payments are subject to payroll taxes while distributions are not, creating a compliance risk when owners try to minimize wages to reduce their tax burden.

Riggs identifies several factors that determine what counts as reasonable compensation, including the owner's specific duties, professional experience, hours worked, and what comparable businesses pay for similar roles. The IRS scrutinizes situations where salaries appear artificially low relative to the distributions an owner takes, and auditors can reclassify distributions as wages — triggering back taxes, interest, and penalties.

Read more Underinsured Motorist Coverage: What to Know After a Serious Crash →

Documentation is central to defending a salary decision. Riggs emphasizes that supporting records — such as written job descriptions, compensation studies, and records of hours worked — are essential if the IRS questions the methodology used to set pay. Without that paper trail, even a defensible salary figure becomes difficult to substantiate during an examination.

The issue carries broader implications for small-business owners who elect S corp status specifically to reduce self-employment tax exposure. While the structure can offer legitimate tax advantages, those benefits depend entirely on the owner maintaining a compensation strategy that holds up to regulatory scrutiny. Underpaying on salary to maximize distributions is one of the more common audit triggers facing closely held S corporations.

Continue reading at All Financial Services & Investing.